Teaching Lab NYC District 27 - MS 210, NY Report

2021-2022 End of Year Report

Background

To date (Jun 17, 2022), Teaching Lab has administered the following to participants from your school or district during SY21-22:

  • 0 complete responses to the End of Session Surveys that gather participant feedback on facilitation from session to session;

  • 0 complete responses to the End of Course Surveys that gather participant feedback on each PL course;

  • 0 complete responses to the first Knowledge or Self-Reported Practices Assessments and 0 to the second Knowledge or Self-Reported Practices Assessments;

  • 114 complete responses to the Baseline Diagnostic Educator Survey and 0 to the Follow-up Educator Survey that collects information on teachers’ use of curricula, mindsets, self-reported practices, and school environment.

Below are the results presented in various sections: Participant Background and Demographics Summary, Participant Perceptions, Participant Knowledge, Teachers’ Mindsets & School Environment, Administrators’ Mindsets & Observational Practices, Instructional Practice, and Student Outcomes.

Section 1: Participant Background and Demographics Summary

Teaching Lab collects information on participants’ gender and racial identity, years of experience, content area and grades taught, summarized below.

Gender and Racial Identity

Years of Teaching Experience

Content Area

Grades

Prior Experience with Teaching Lab Professional Learning

Roles

Section 2: Participant Perceptions

Teaching Lab collects participant feedback on facilitation from session to session and then on the entire course once it has concluded. Below are results for both.

Section 2a: End of Session Summary

Participants’ aggregate feedback on each session is provided below.

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the facilitators were fully prepared for the session.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the facilitators responded to the group’s needs.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the facilitators facilitated the content clearly.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the facilitators effectively built a safe learning community.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the facilitators demonstrated deep knowledge of the content they facilitated.

ELA

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the facilitators were fully prepared for the session.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the facilitators responded to the group’s needs.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the facilitators facilitated the content clearly.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the facilitators effectively built a safe learning community.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the facilitators demonstrated deep knowledge of the content they facilitated.

Math

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • NA strongly agree or agree that the facilitators were fully prepared for the session.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that the facilitators responded to the group’s needs.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that the facilitators facilitated the content clearly.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that the facilitators effectively built a safe learning community.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that the facilitators demonstrated deep knowledge of the content they facilitated.

Here, by visualizing ratings of strongly agree/agree in blue areas, and all other ratings in black areas we visualize feedback over time (If there is just one point of feedback this appears as a dot).

Finally, here are some highlights from the textual feedback of the end of session survey

Responses to “What could have been better about today’s session?”

Responses to “What went well in today’s session?”

Responses to “What additional feedback do you have about their facilitation skills?”

Section 2b: End of Course Summary

Participants’ feedback on each course is provided below.

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • NA% strongly agree or agree that they were satisfied with how the course was facilitated.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that they felt a sense of community with the other participants in the course even though they were meeting virtually.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that they will apply what they have learned in the course to their practice in the next 4-6 weeks.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the independent online work activities were well-designed to help me meet learning targets.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the strategies I’ve learned in the course are easy to implement.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that they’ve learned in this course will improve my supervision of teachers.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that they’ve learned in this course will improve my instruction.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the course has supported me in being responsive to students’ backgrounds, cultures, and points of view.

ELA

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they were satisfied with how the course was facilitated.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they felt a sense of community with the other participants in the course even though they were meeting virtually.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they will apply what they have learned in the course to their practice in the next 4-6 weeks.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the independent online work activities were well-designed to help me meet learning targets.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the strategies I’ve learned in the course are easy to implement.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they’ve learned in this course will improve my supervision of teachers.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they’ve learned in this course will improve my instruction.
  • There is no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the course has supported me in being responsive to students’ backgrounds, cultures, and points of view.

Math

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • NA strongly agree or agree that they were satisfied with how the course was facilitated.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that they felt a sense of community with the other participants in the course even though they were meeting virtually.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that they will apply what they have learned in the course to their practice in the next 4-6 weeks.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that the independent online work activities were well-designed to help me meet learning targets.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that the strategies I’ve learned in the course are easy to implement.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that they’ve learned in this course will improve my supervision of teachers.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that they’ve learned in this course will improve my instruction.
  • NA strongly agree or agree that the course has supported me in being responsive to students’ backgrounds, cultures, and points of view.

Here, by visualizing ratings of strongly agree/agree in blue areas, and all other ratings in black areas we visualize feedback over time (If there is just one point of feedback this appears as a dot).

Several samplings of the textual feedback from the course survey are presented below.

Responses to “What went well in this course?”

Responses to “Overall, what could have been better in this course?”

Responses to “What is the learning from this course that you are most excited about trying out?”

Responses to “Which activities best supported your learning in this course?”

Responses to “Feel free to leave us any additional comments, concerns, or questions.”

Section 2c: Ongoing Coaching Feedback

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the coaching was clear.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the coaches made necessary adjustments based on my needs.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the coach seemed fully prepared for the coaching sessions.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the coaches demonstrated deep knowledge of the content they coach.
  • NA% strongly agree or agree that the coaches built a safe learning environment.

ELA

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements for ELA:

  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coach seemed fully prepared for the coaching sessions.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaches made necessary adjustments based on my needs.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaches built a safe learning environment.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaches demonstrated deep knowledge of the content they coach.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaching was clear.

Math

For Math Content we see the following % agree or strongly agree:

  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaching was clear.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaches demonstrated deep knowledge of the content they coach.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coach seemed fully prepared for the coaching sessions.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaches made necessary adjustments based on my needs.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the coaches built a safe learning environment.

Section 2d: End of Coaching Feedback

In summary, we see the following % agree or strongly agree with the above statements:

  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the course has supported them in being responsive to students’ backgrounds, cultures, and points of view.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the strategies they’ve learned through coaching have improved their instruction or their coaching and supervision of teachers.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they have applied or will apply what they have learned to their practice in the next 4-6 weeks.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that the strategies they’ve learned are easy to implement.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they were satisfied with the overall quality of the coaching series.
  • There was no data to show the % that strongly agree or agree that they were satisfied with the coaching support they received.

ELA

Math

Section 2e: Final Feedback

Final Qualitative Feedback - Overall, what did you gain from the professional learning you received from Teaching Lab this year?

Final Qualitative Feedback - Overall, what could have improved about the professional learning you received from Teaching Lab this year?

Teachers’ Top Professional Learning Needs

Section 3: Participant Knowledge (pre/post PL course)

Section 3a: Summary Information

Section 3b: Knowledge Question Details

Section 4: Teachers’ Mindsets & School Environment

Teaching Lab administers a Diagnostic Educator Survey in the fall and a Follow-up Educator Survey in the spring. The results are below.

Section 4a: Teachers - Use of Curricula (ELA)

Teachers responded about the different curricula they use regularly and the most often. For ELA subjects we see the following results:

Section 4b: Teachers - Use of Curricula (Math)

Section 4c: Teachers - Mindsets

Teachers responded to items about the recognition of race and culture and holding high expectations for all students.

Overall

ELA/Literacy

Mathematics

Recognizing Race and Culture Items

High Expectations Items

Teachers also responded to six items about self-confidence in their ability to engage in culturally responsive and sustaining education (CRSE) practices on a scale from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident). Responses were averaged across items. Higher scores correspond to higher self confidence.

Culturally Responsive and Sustaining Education Self-Efficacy Items

Section 4d: Educators’ Perceptions of School Culture and Climate

Teachers responded to items about their school environment.

ELA/Literacy

Mathematics

Section 5: Administrators’ Mindsets & Observational Practices

Teaching Lab administers a Diagnostic Educator Survey in the fall and a Follow-up Educator Survey in the spring. The results are below.

Section 5a: Administrators - Mindsets

Administrators responded to items about the recognition of race and culture and holding high expectations for all students.

Administrators - Recognizing Race & Culture

Administrators - High Expectations

Administrators - Culturally Responsive and Sustaining Education Self-Efficacy Items

Section 5b: Administrators - Observational Practices

Administrators responded to items about the focus of their observational practices.

Section 6: Instructional Practice

Teaching Lab staff observed teachers using the IPG rubric. Ratings of 3 and 4 on 4-point Likert scales and Yes on a Yes/No items were considered positive.

Section 6a: Aggregate Ratings

Overall Core Action Progression

ELA

Math

Section 7: Student Outcomes

Teachers administered a student survey to at least one of their groups. Using 5-point Likert-type scales, students responded to eight items related to their teachers’ engagement in CRSE practices, three items related to teacher-student relationships, five items about self-efficacy, six items about happiness and sense of belonging, and five items about being challenged. Responses were averaged across items. Higher scores correspond to more positive experiences.

Overall Student Data

Culturally Responsive & Sustaining Education

Teacher-Student Relationships

Self-Efficacy

Happiness & Sense of Belonging

Being Challenged

 

Return to Website

info@teachinglab.org